Iza’s Story

And people stayed at home
And read books and listened
And rested and did exercises
And made art and played
And new ways of being
And then they stopped.

And listened deeper
Someone meditated
Someone was praying
Someone was dancing
Someone met their own shadow
And people started thinking differently.

And people healed.
And in the absence of people who lived
In ignorant ways
Senseless and heartless,
The earth also began to heal.

Nach einem Gedicht von Grace Ramsay [Kathleen O’Meara, 1839–1888]

Kathleen O’Meara, Künstlername Grace Ramsay (1839 – 10 November 1888) war eine irisch-französische Autorin, in der späten victorianischen Zeit. Das Gedicht stammt aus “Izas Story”, die den Konflikt zwischen polnischen Patrioten und der russischen Besatzung schildert. Die Kämpfer gingen in Isolation im Untergrund und erlebten eine Art “Corona-Zeit”.

From Co-rona Living to Co-Living

Once upon a time there were three grandmothers. Doreen, Dotty and Carol (you couldn’t make it up if you tried). They all lived happily in their own flats until one day they were told they had to self-isolate. All in their 70s and friends for at least 40 years, they decided it would be much more fun to isolate together. First of all they agreed to wait out a week alone to check they did not have the virus, then they moved in together. It was a form of co-isolation to combat loneliness. As well having to agree on which home to move into – the one which afforded the most private space but also room to exercise and eat together – they made sure they had Netflix and quite a bit of wine.

So what will these ladies do after the virus has dissipated? Will they pool their resources and set up home in the larger of the homes? Will they live together happily ever after? The strange thing is that when looked at through the eyes and experience of social isolation, the whole individualism trend sometimes can seem like a vain indulgence. Writing in the New York Times, David Brooks points out the great paradox is that we had to be set apart in order to feel together. It’s like, he reminds us, when you’re starving, and food is all you can think about. Suddenly everybody has human connection on the top of mind. But will it last? Will we gravitate to more co-living rather than co-isolation?

If we want to be optimistic we would say that social solidarity is tenacious. That we will have learnt that we will continue to need an active commitment to the common good beyond the fallout of the virus — not only private but our public lives. We will perhaps come to see that co-living has more to offer than economies of scale, more to give than shared terraces and kitchens where you can flirt and cook with your neighbour. We will see the potential of co-living through the lens of those who have spent many weeks or even months alone. We will get a taste of the fact that the benefits of a communally cooked and shared meal linger long after the plate is clean.


The Post-Corona Hygge

Hygge, the latest sofa style, colour of the year, new cushion collections. There is something about these home trends that suddenly feels almost decadent, indecent. You might say they were always just “first world solutions to first world problems”. Yet how we form, celebrate or even decorate and furnish our homes is suddenly more important than ever. We need home to remember who we are, and what is important.

So, let’s try to imagine ourselves in our homes in a years’ time. Sounds weird, but if we want to think and understand about how this crisis can change how we live, we can use RE-gnosis. This means we do not look from now into the future (as with prognosis), but from the future back to today. It’s not as mad as it sounds. So, imagine we are through the crisis, and we take a good look around our homes, at our walls, floors, cupboards and belongings. The worn-out Marie Kondo book is back on the shelf, and we are delighted to see that our homes are tidier, more organised, we have made them more comfortable, more practical, more functional. We have even learned to mend things ourselves, put up shelves, painted the walls, and there is a pile of things ready to go the charity shop. The kitchen table with its marks and stains no longer looks dirty and used, but tells the story of a life lived with family and friends. The cellar no longer looks like the set of a crime series and we have repurposed grandmother’s trunk from the attic. And we can still remember that warm feeling that came as we began to take control over our private space, we felt we were taking back a little control over our lives. We will wonder why we once came home and took it all for granted, why we neglected our homes, why we never really noticed or appreciated the subtle lines of the legs of the dining table, the soft curve of the arms of the sofa. We will wonder why we treated our homes like one of those aunts that you really keep meaning to see but don’t ever get round to ringing.

So, let’s also try a little backcasting. It’s a form of Re-gnosis whereby if you want to attain a particular goal, you look at the actions that need to be taken to get there. Let’s, so to speak, phone the aunt. Define a desirable future. Imagine the aunt – your home as you always envisioned it could be and work backwards to identify how you will get there. When not now, then when?

In seeing ourselves in our homes in the future we allow ourselves to look more critically at our belongings – who they were made by, where they came from and what they mean to us. Do they bring us joy (yes that!) and comfort? Do the estimated 10,000 things that each of us own, reflect our beliefs and real needs? Do we envisage “hero materials” such as cradle-to-cradle or even Vegan design, are we investing in design not simply for designs sake, but for a long-term relationship to the object, and the ideals and ideas behind it. It is, we see, not just about what things are in your home, but how they really make you feel and think.

Phrases such as “home is the place where our soul feels that it has found it proper physical container” can no longer be dismissed as just cool statements, but they cut to the heart of our new reality. The same could be said of the much ridiculed and discussed mindfulness trend. The mantra “paying attention to what you are paying attention to”, suddenly takes on new meaning and importance and urgency. Such cultural shifts and concepts are no longer seen as simply short-term solutions and dismissed as playthings for the privileged. It is about facing a new reality about where is home, how we form it and who we really want to live with.

It has been said that the most homesick are the people who have no home. We had become a world of nomads, promoting and celebrating flexible, mobile lifestyles. The future will be about reclaiming our sense of home. About understanding that home is “about the familiar, about gravity, about falling back into the self after being dispersed and over-extended in the world” (Andrew Bush, Bonnettstown, 1989).
Or simply said, Hygge is dead, long live hygge.

The Post Corona World

A Backwards Corona Forecast:
Or how we will be surprised when the crisis is “over”

At the moment I am often asked when Corona “will be over” and when everything will return to normal. My answer is: never. There are historical moments when the future changes direction. We call them bifurcations. Or deep crises. These times are now.
The world as we know it is dissolving. But behind it comes a new world, the formation of which we can at least imagine. For this I would like to offer you an exercise with which we have had good experiences in vision processes at companies. We call it the RE-gnosis. In contrast to the PRO-gnosis, we do not look “into the future” with this technique. But from the future BACK to today. Sounds crazy? Let’s try it:

The RE-gnosis: Our world in autumn 2020

Let’s imagine a situation in autumn, let’s say in September 2020. We are sitting in a street cafe in a big city. It is warm and people are walking down the pavements again.

Do they move differently? Is everything the same as before? Does the wine, the cocktail, the coffee taste like it used to? Like it did before Corona?
Or even better?
Looking back, what will we be surprised about?

We will be surprised that our social distancing rarely led to a feeling of isolation. On the contrary, after an initial paralysing shock, many of us were relieved that the constant racing, talking, communicating on a multitude of channels suddenly came to a halt. Distancing does not necessarily mean loss, but can open up new possibilities. Some have already experienced this, for example trying interval fasting — and suddenly enjoyed food again. Paradoxically, the physical distance that the virus forced upon us also created new closeness. We met people who we would never have met otherwise. We contacted old friends more often, strengthened ties that had become loose. Families, neighbours, friends, have become closer and sometimes even solved hidden conflicts.

The social courtesy that we previously increasingly missed, increased.
Now in autumn 2020 there is a completely different mood at football games than in spring when there was a lot of mass rage. We wonder why that is.

We will be amazed at how quickly digital cultural techniques have suddenly proven themselves in practice. Teleconferencing and video conferencing, which most colleagues had always resisted (the business class flight was better), turned out to be quite practical and productive. Teachers learned a lot about internet teaching. The home office became a matter of course for many — including the improvisation and time juggling that goes with it.

At the same time, apparently outdated cultural techniques experienced a renaissance. Suddenly you got not only the answering machine when you called, but real people. The virus spawned a new culture of long phone calls without people juggling a second screen. The “messages” themselves suddenly took on a new meaning. You really communicated again. Nobody was kept waiting anymore. Nobody was stalled. This created a new culture of accessibility, of commitment.

People who never came to rest due to the hectic rush, including YOUNG people, suddenly went for long walks (an activity formerly unknown to them). Reading books suddenly became a cult.

Reality shows suddenly seemed awkward and the whole trivia trash, the garbage for the soul that flowed through all channels seemed ridiculous. No, it didn’t completely disappear. But it was rapidly losing value.

Can anyone remember the political correctness debate? The infinite number of cultural wars? What, we will ask ourselves, was that all about?
Crises work primarily by dissolving old phenomena, making them superfluous …

Cynicism, a casual way of devaluing the world, was suddenly out.
The exaggeration and culture of fear and hysteria in the media was limited after a short first outbreak.
In addition, the infinite flood of cruel crime series reached its tipping point.

We will be surprised that drugs were developed in the summer that increased the survival rate. This lowered the death rate and made Corona a virus that we have to deal with — much like the flu and many other diseases. Medical progress helped. But we also learned that it was not so much technology, but a crucial change in social behaviour. The decisive factor was that people could have solidarity and be constructive despite radical restrictions. Human-social intelligence has helped. The much-vaunted artificial intelligence, which promised to solve everything, has only had a limited effect on Corona.

This has shifted the relationship between technology and culture. Before the crisis, technology seemed to be the panacea, the bearer of all utopias. No one — or only a few hard-boiled people — still believe in the great digital redemption today. The big technology hype is over. We are again turning our attention to the humane questions: What is mankind? What do we mean to each other?

We are astonished to see how much humour and humanity actually emerged in the days of the virus.

We will be amazed at how far the economy could shrink without collapsing, something which was predicted during every pre-corona tax increase and every government intervention. Although there was a “black April”, a deep economic downturn and a 50 percent drop in the stock market, although many companies went bankrupt, shrank or mutated into something completely different, it never came to zero. As if the economy was a breathing being that can also nap or sleep and even dream.

Today in the Autumn, there is a global economy again. But global just-in-time production, with huge branched value chains, in which millions of individual parts are carted across the planet, is now in trouble. It is currently being dismantled and reconfigured. Interim storage facilities, depots and reserves are growing again everywhere in production and service facilities. Local production is booming, networks are being localised, and crafts are experiencing a renaissance. The global system is drifting towards GLOCALisation: the localisation of the global.

We will be surprised that even the loss of assets due to the stock market crash does not hurt as much as it felt in the beginning. In the new world, wealth suddenly no longer plays the decisive role. Good neighbours and a blossoming vegetable garden are more important.
Could it be that the virus has changed our lives in a direction that we wanted to change anyway?

RE-gnosis: coping with the present through a leap into the future.

Why does this kind of “from the future scenario” seem so irritatingly different from a classic forecast? This is related to the specific properties of our sense of the future. When we look “into the future”, we typically only see the dangers and problems coming towards us that pile up onto insurmountable barriers. Like a locomotive coming out of the tunnel that runs over us. This fear barrier separates us from the future. That’s why horror futures are always the easiest to depict.

RE-gnosis, on the other hand, form a loop of knowledge in which we include ourselves and our inner change in the future. We connect internally with the future, and this creates a bridge between today and tomorrow. A form of “Future Mind” is created.

If you do it right, something like future intelligence is created. We are able to anticipate not only the external “events”, but also the internal adaptations with which we react to a changed world.
That feels very different from a forecast that always has something dead, sterile in its anticipatory character. We leave the stiffness of fear and return to the vitality that belongs to every true future.

We all know the feeling of successfully overcoming fear. When we go to the dentist for treatment, we are worried a long time in advance. We lose control on the dentist’s chair and it hurts before it hurts. In anticipating this feeling, we bathe ourselves in fears that can completely overwhelm us. Once we have survived the treatment, there is a feeling of coping: the world looks young and fresh again, and we are suddenly full of drive.

Neuro-biologically, fear adrenaline is replaced by dopamine, a type of endogenous drug of the future. While adrenaline leads us to flee or fight (which is not really productive in the dentist’s chair, and just as useless in the fight against corona), dopamine opens our brain synapses: we are excited about what is to come, curious, foresighted. When we have a healthy dopamine level, we make plans, we have visions that lead us to the forward-looking action.

Surprisingly, many experience exactly this in the Corona crisis. A massive loss of control suddenly turns into a veritable intoxication of the positive. After a period of bewilderment and fear, an inner strength arises.The world “ends”, but with the experience that we are still there, a kind of new being arises from inside us.
In the middle of civilisation’s shutdown, we run through forests or parks, or across almost empty spaces. This is not an apocalypse, but a new beginning.
This is how it turns out: Change begins as a changed pattern of expectations, perceptions and world connections. Sometimes it is precisely the break with routines, the familiar, that releases our sense of the future again. The idea and certainty that everything could be completely different — and even better.

We may even be surprised that Trump will be voted out of office in November. The AfD [a right-wing to far-right political party in Germany] is losing popularity and attention because a malicious, divisive policy does not fit into a Corona world. The Corona crisis made it clear that those who want to incite people against each other have nothing to contribute to real questions about the future. When things get serious, the destructiveness that lives in populism becomes clear.

Politics — in its original sense as the formation of social responsibilities — received new credibility through this crisis, a new legitimacy. Precisely because it had to act in an ”authoritarian” manner, politics created trust in society. Science also experienced an astonishing renaissance in the crisis. Virologists and epidemologists became media stars, but also “futuristic” philosophers, sociologists, psychologists, anthropologists, who were previously left on the sidelines of polarised debates, regained their voice and value.
Fake news, however, rapidly lost market value. Conspiracy theories also suddenly looked ridiculous.

A virus as an accelerator of evolution

Deep crises also point to another basic principle of change: the trend-countertrend synthesis.
The new world after Corona — or better with Corona — arises from the disruption of the megatrend CONNECTIVITY. Politically and economically this phenomenon is also called “globalisation”. The interruption of connectivity — through border closings, separations, seclusions, quarantines — does not lead to the abolition of the connections. But it enables the reorganisation of the things that hold our world together and carry it into the future. There is a phase jump in socio-economic systems.

The world to come will appreciate distance again — and this will make connectedness more qualitative. Autonomy and dependency, opening and closing are rebalanced. This can make the world more complex, but also more stable. This transformation is largely a blind evolutionary process — because one fails, the new, the viable, prevails. This makes you dizzy at first, but then it shows its inner meaning: and what connects the paradoxes on a new level is sustainable.
This process of complexation — not to be confused with COMPLICATION — can also be consciously designed by people. Those who can, who speak the language of the coming complexity, will be the leaders of tomorrow. The hope-bearers. The up and coming Gretas.

“Through Corona we will adapt our entire attitude towards life — in the sense of our existence as living beings in the midst of other forms of life.”

Slavo Zizek at the height of the corona crisis in mid-March

Every deep crisis leaves a story, a narrative that points far into the future. One of the strongest images left by the corona virus are of the Italians making music on the balconies. The second image was sent to us by satellite images that suddenly showed the industrial areas of China and Italy free of smog. In 2020, human CO2 emissions will drop for the first time. That very fact will do something to us.

If the virus can do that, then can we possibly do it? Maybe the virus was just a messenger from the future. The drastic message is: Human civilisation has become too dense, too fast, and overheated. It is racing too fast in a direction in which there is no future.
But it can reinvent itself.
System reset.
Cool down!
Music on the balconies!

This is how the future works.

Note: This text can be freely printed with the credit to www.horx.com and www.zukunftsinstitut.de.